Compact PC intel compute stick original. I take it out of my wide trousers

Intel Compute Stick Review | PC with very limited capabilities

Intel recently announced a micro PC Intel Compute Stick with Windows OS. At official Intel dealers, its price will be $150, while the version based on Ubuntu Linux, with slightly modified characteristics, should be sold for $110.

Intel Compute Stick is not a desktop replacement. A “PC flash drive” is positioned as an additional computing module that connects to a TV or display via an HDMI connector. Intel Compute Stick designed to handle simple tasks, including editing simple documents, watching videos or just talking with friends via Skype. The device has dimensions of 114x38x13 mm. It is equipped with a wireless communication module, USB 2.0, Bluetooth, video and audio controllers.

Intel Compute Stick available with two OS: Windows 8.1 and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. The Windows version (STCK1A32WFC) appeared at the end of April, while the Ubuntu version (STCK1A8LFC) should be released in June.

Intel Compute Stick Review | Specifications

Intel Compute Stick Specifications
operating system	Windows 8.1 with Bing 32-bit Ubuntu (Linux) 14.04 LTS 64-bit
CPU	Intel Atom Z3735F, 1.33 GHz, 2 MB cache, fan cooling
BIOS	FCBYT10H.86A.0018.2015.0330.1117 (3/30/2015)
GPU	Intel HD Graphics with driver v.15.33.27.3910
System memory	Single channel DDR3L-R-S @ 1.35 V, 1333 MHz Windows: 2 GB Ubuntu: 1 GB
Storage	Built-in Samsung MGB4GC eMMC Windows - 32 GB, Samsung Ubuntu - 8 GB SDXC v3.0 slot with UHS I support
Periphery	Integrated 802.11bgn Wi-Fi controller USB 2.0 Bluetooth 4.0 MicroSD slot
Net	Integrated 802.11bgn controller
Audio	Intel HD Audio over HDMI with multiple channel support
Power Requirements	Adapter for power supply 5 V, 2 A
Case size	103 mm x 37 mm x 12 mm

Intel Compute Stick Review | First impressions

At first we thought that Intel Compute Stick It's great as a portable PC, capable of turning any HDMI-enabled TV into a work computer, although it would require you to carry around a keyboard and mouse. But then we adjusted our opinion. The device can turn a large TV into a working computer, allowing you to surf the Internet, chat on Skype or work with email, all through the familiar Windows interface. A potential problem, in our opinion, is the lack of processing power and RAM when working with multiple programs. There should be no problems with single applications.

Despite its small size, one of the main problems Intel Compute Stick is its external form. With a device length of 103 mm, there should be enough space for installation behind the TV. Some TVs have HDMI connectors on the side of the display, but there are models that are very close to the wall; install them in such TVs Intel Compute Stick It's unlikely to work without an HDMI adapter cable.

Our review sample included a 20cm HDMI extender, but we used the 90cm extender to Intel Compute Stick was located in front of the display, making it easier to access the USB port and power button. Intel Compute Stick Light enough that you can leave it hanging from the 20cm extension behind the screen if you wish.

Speaking of USB ports. Depending on how many devices you want to connect to Intel Compute Stick, you may need a USB hub, especially if you don't have a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse. According to Intel representatives, to install additional USB ports in Intel Compute Stick Not enough interior space. In addition, a prerequisite for the device to operate is a TV with HDMI support. The company also confirmed that Intel Compute Stick will only work with HDMI direct input (no adapters).

Intel Compute Stick Review | External description

Intel Compute Stick has a minimal external set of interfaces and controls. One USB 2.0 slot is available for additional devices, and a microSD slot is provided for storage expansion. We installed a 32 GB card into it without any problems. Intel Compute Stick It also comes with Bluetooth 4.0, so if you have a Bluetooth-enabled keyboard and mouse, you can go wireless and leave the USB port free.

For the most part, the Bluetooth keyboard worked well. There were no problems with the Logitech Folio. But when we connected a cheaper RockSoul Bluetooth keyboard, we noticed frequent connection dropouts that required us to constantly re-pair it. Intel Compute Stick. In this situation we are not inclined to blame Intel Compute Stick, since the Folio worked without problems, but the functionality of the keyboard under the RockSoul brand is still in question.

External components of Intel Compute Stick

The power button is located on the side next to the HDMI connector, which is not very convenient. When disconnecting or setting up the device, you have to take it very carefully so as not to accidentally press this button. We hope that this flaw will be corrected in later versions.

Included Intel Compute Stick There is a 90 cm power cable. One of its connectors is inserted into the power socket on the device, and the USB connector is inserted into the 5 V socket.

For physical security, instead of a Kensington lock, Intel Compute Stick two interconnected recesses are used on the sides of the body. A thin metal cable is threaded through them, which is then crimped. This type of lock is typical for industrial type products.

Intel Compute Stick Review | Internal structure

Intel Compute Stick is equipped with a quad-core Atom Z3735F processor, belonging to the Intel SoC family based on Bay Trail architecture. This 64-bit SoC was introduced in early 2014. It has a 2 MB L2 cache and operates at a base frequency of 1.33 GHz (1.83 GHz in boost mode). The RAM is a single-channel DDR3L memory with a frequency of 1333 MHz and a capacity of 2 GB.

For working with graphics Intel Compute Stick uses Intel HD Graphics integrated into the Atom Z3735F processor. With the Intel HD Graphics Control Panel, users can adjust general image output settings, manage power settings, and create custom profiles that allow them to save video settings for different applications.

It's easy to open the case, but all the most interesting things are under the radiator

The data storage system is represented by Samsung MBG4GC eMMC flash memory with a capacity of 32 GB. It is designed for mobile devices and uses high-density MLC NAND memory chips with an MMC controller. Of the 32 GB indicated on the box, Windows Disk Management shows that 23.04 GB is for the root file system, 5.86 GB is for the recovery partition, and the remaining 100 MB is allocated for the EFI System Partition.

The single-band Wi-Fi module Azurewave AW-NB177NF M.2 is responsible for wireless communication. It supports 802.11 b/g/n standards and operates in the 2.4 GHz band while providing Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity. At a nominal speed of 150 Mbps, performance is comparable to the N150 Wi-Fi adapter, which is significantly slower than modern AC Wi-Fi devices.

Intel Compute Stick Review | Operation

The very first thing we wanted to check was how Intel Compute Stick copes with online video playback. To our surprise, watching movies and shows on Netflix and Hulu was quite comfortable. The YouTube video played without delay. Streaming is smooth and built-in Intel Compute Stick The audio controller outputs fairly clear sound to the TV speakers. When playing videos on Netflix, there was a slight delay when moving the mouse across the screen, but this did not affect streaming content. This problem usually occurs when the mouse is used further than three meters from the PC. But in our case, there was about 2.5 meters from the display to the mouse.

We also tried using Remote Desktop on Intel Compute Stick and connect to your computer via Wi-Fi. There was some delay when connecting and logging into the computer for the first time. Typically, when using Remote Desktop, such a delay is not observed, but taking into account that the Wi-Fi module Intel Compute Stick doesn't support 802.11ac and that we're running an SoC, a Remote Desktop session might be too taxing for the device. But after the first session, the time to start the program decreased. However, by connecting an 802.11ac USB network adapter to Intel Compute Stick, we did not notice any difference in response.

Intel Compute Stick Review | Equipment

In the box with the sample that we received for testing, we found the following components:

Intel Compute Stick with Windows 8.1 Bing 32-bit preinstalled;
USB AC power adapter, 5V, 2A;
USB cable for power adapter, 75 cm long;
HDMI extension cable 20 cm long;
adapters for power sockets of different standards.

According to Intel, the retail version Intel Compute Stick will have the same equipment, plus instructions and user manual.

Intel Compute Stick Review | Additional accessories

Since you only get 32 GB of storage in the Windows version, you shouldn't ignore the possibility of expanding it using a microSD card. The device supports cards up to 128GB, which is worth taking advantage of. The built-in flash memory won't last long, especially if you save files locally, so extra storage space won't hurt.

In addition, you can use cloud storage. Considering that Intel Compute Stick Runs Windows 8.1, there are many options available for cloud storage. For example, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox and Google Drive provide free storage of a certain capacity, but you will have to pay extra for additional space on such a drive.

Accessories for Intel Compute Stick

Using a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse makes sense because it allows you to keep the only USB port free. Wireless technologies Intel Compute Stick frees the user from wires dangling on the floor. If you can't use a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, you can buy a wireless USB keyboard with a trackpad or a set consisting of a keyboard and mouse with a common USB receiver.

Also not out of place on the list would be a USB hub with external power supply, which allows you to connect devices, especially peripherals, with a power consumption of more than 500 mA. Since Intel Compute Stick only supports USB 2.0, a corresponding hub will be inexpensive. USB 2.0 hubs are great for USB card readers, keyboards, mice or webcams. If the speed of the built-in wireless module is not enough for you, you can install a wired USB controller or a faster USB Wi-Fi adapter.

list of tested compatibility with Intel Compute Stick peripherals can be found at intel.com.

Intel Compute Stick Review | Testing methodology

For testing Intel Compute Stick we had to borrow a few techniques from reviews of tablets and networking equipment. It was also necessary to take into account the low performance of the device. We understand that this is not a gaming system or a workstation, so we have set appropriate expectations. In addition to performance, we are interested in functionality Intel Compute Stick as an additional computing resource for a TV or monitor.

To test the processor, graphics and storage, we connected Intel Compute Stick to a 24-inch Asus VS247 monitor with an HDMI port.

Web tests were carried out on the same Asus monitor, and to analyze network throughput at different distances between an Asus RT-AC66U dual-lane router with an ASRock VisionX mini-PC connected to it via Ethernet (Core i7-4712MQ, AMD HD8850M GPU, 8 GB RAM , 256 GB SSD and 2 TB HDD) we used a small cart.

The Atom z3735F quad-core processor was tested using Primate Lab Geekbench 3. Geekbench is a cross-platform benchmark designed to test CPU and memory performance. One of the main advantages of Geekbench is access to a large database of Primate Labs tested devices, including Windows, iOS and Android platforms. Today we are interested in single-core and multi-core tests using integer and floating point calculations, as well as tasks that load RAM.

We will check the speed of sequential and random I/O operations on the Samsung integrated drive using CrystalDiskMark.

The PassMark Advanced Networking module allows you to test end-to-end transmission speeds over Wi-Fi. The program is installed on each computer in a client/server configuration. On one it runs as a server, on the other - as a client. To test TCP traffic from Intel Compute Stick On ASRock Mini-PC we used the standard fixed block size of 16384 bytes. Test results show received and transmitted data, average speed in kbps and processor load. Considering that Intel Compute Stick only supports 2.4 GHz transmission, we limited other devices in our network comparison tests to the same range.

Single-chip systems of the Bay Trail family are found today in smartphones, tablets, compact motherboards and microcomputers. The Silvermont architecture turned out to be a significant step forward for Intel and allowed it to strengthen its position in the mobile market. The most successful was, perhaps, the Z3700 series, which even opened a second wind for the microcomputer segment.

With four cores and a typical consumption of 2 or 2.2 W, these models made it possible to create products with support for the Windows operating system that can cope with common mass typewriter tasks - the Internet, office, multimedia. At the same time, we must understand that such a reduction in power did not pass without a trace. The chips targeted by the manufacturer at the tablet segment have significant limitations in terms of hardware configuration, including a maximum amount of RAM of 1, 2 or 4 GB and the lack of modern fast external peripheral interfaces. However, as experience has shown, for a certain category of users such products are very interesting, especially considering their relatively low price.

This spring we have already tested one of these models, and today we will get acquainted with a microcomputer developed by Intel itself, which they called Intel Compute Stick. One of the key characteristics of the device is ease of use - “Connect, Compute, It’s that simple.”

This solution in the HDMI dongle format is interesting for its compact size, performance sufficient for popular tasks and affordable cost. The company positions the device as an addition to monitors or TVs, turning them into a “real computer.” Use cases include basic office PC, multimedia, thin client and video advertising.

Two modifications of the device are presented:

with Windows 8.1 with Bing operating system, 2 GB RAM and 32 GB storage
with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, 1 GB RAM and 8 GB storage

The remaining characteristics of these modifications are the same. The first version took part in this testing.

Delivery set and appearance

Intel has both the experience and the ability to ensure the attractiveness of its solutions on the shelves of retail chains, photographs in online store catalogs, and simply in the hands of the user. The Intel Compute Stick comes in a brightly designed box made of sturdy cardboard, which may be the envy of some smartphone suppliers. Glossy and matte varnish is used, there are photographs of the device, technical specifications, descriptions of ports and connectors. In Russian - only a couple of words with an explanation of the configuration.

The computer itself is located in a special insert at the top of the box. The rest of the space is occupied by a short (20 cm) HDMI cable (female-male), a meter Micro-USB cable, a 5 V 2 A power supply with a set of inserts for different sockets, brief instructions for getting started and a card for activating an annual antivirus subscription McAfee. This is all quite enough to work with a computer.

True, there are small comments on individual elements. In particular, the HDMI cable could be made rigid with shape memory, and the cable outlet on the power supply could be placed on the side rather than at the end. Still, when we talk about compactness, spending 11 cm from the plane of the outlet is not very convenient.

On the manufacturer's website in the support section you can download driver and BIOS updates for this device. True, for the second there is a certain remark regarding the complexity of the installation process. Of course, given the almost complete lack of support for similar nameless products, this is not bad, but still, in this case, it was worth somehow simplifying and improving these aspects.

The computer case is made of durable black plastic. One element is glossy, which can hardly be called the optimal choice, given the positioning of the model, and the second is matte. Overall dimensions excluding the HDMI connector are 38x104x12.5 mm.

On one of the short ends there is a connector for connecting to a monitor. Fortunately, the manufacturer used the full-size HDMI version, so in most cases no adapters will be required. However, it should be noted that the width of the model’s body is quite large, so it will not be convenient to use it with all TVs. In this case, the supplied extension cord will be useful.

The disadvantage of using this format is the difficulty of placement in a rack with equipment or at a great distance from the receiver, since the required cables of sufficient length are found in the assortment of specialized stores much less often than traditional options. It might be worth adding a compact adapter to the HDMI socket in the box.

On the top glossy cover of the device, in addition to the manufacturer’s logo, you can see two ventilation grilles (another pair is present at the ends). Moreover, a fan is visible under the largest of them. Yes, despite the low declared power consumption of the device, it has an active cooling system. As we will see in the tests, this solution ensures the absence of processor throttling even under high load, but it leads to the fact that the model can no longer be called silent. There is also a blue power LED here, and on the edge there is a hole for a lanyard, which can probably be used for basic theft protection.

All connectors and ports of the model are located on the long ends. One has a slot for memory cards with a latch. You may need a tool to install or remove the card. On the other hand, it does not protrude from the housing during operation.

On the other side we see the power button. Perhaps it is too close to HDMI, but still quite convenient due to its shape. Next comes Micro-USB for supplying power to the computer and standard USB 2.0 Type A for connecting peripherals.

Model identification numbers can be seen on the bottom cover of the system. The implication is that the device is so light (55g) that it will simply “hang” on an HDMI connector or extender. Not the best option in terms of reliability. Especially considering the relatively weak Micro-USB and the high probability of simultaneously using a “large” USB port.

In general, we see that for the sake of a compact size we had to make some compromises in the design. The solution is more of a product for geeks or a template for other companies than a truly mainstream product for the end consumer.

Specifications

The solution uses the Intel Atom Z3735F SoC as the main element of the hardware platform. We have already met this model in previous publications. An SDP of 2.2 W is specified for this chip, so it is quite appropriate for this device format. The model has four cores with support for 64-bit computing. When there is no load, their frequency drops to 500 MHz, its standard value is 1.33 GHz, and in overclocking mode (Burst) it can reach 1.83 GHz. Today, when automatic frequency control technologies are actively used, exact values do not make much sense, since the criteria for their selection are established, among other things, by the system manufacturer.

As we wrote earlier, this modification of the processor is one of the youngest in the family. It supports only 2 GB of single-channel RAM, does not have a USB 3.0 controller, and the maximum video output resolution is FullHD.

The device in question has 2 GB DDR3L-1333 installed. Out of the box, the operating system already takes up about 700 MB, so there is no need to talk about the possibility of effective multitasking with resource-intensive applications.

The Intel HD Graphics controller supports DirectX 11 and OGL 3.2 and has hardware units for decoding video of popular formats (which does not include H.265). The HDMI video output allows you to connect monitors with resolutions up to 1920x1080, and is also the only wired option for outputting audio from a computer.

As with other microPCs based on such a platform, we tried to test the media center scenario with the device discussed in this article. It should be noted that due to the limited speed of the wireless module, using this model to fully watch video in maximum quality and with HD sound does not seem to be a very convenient option. In addition, here too we encountered certain difficulties with bitstreaming multi-channel audio tracks. So in this case, we can only talk about basic functions for watching online videos or files with stereo tracks and low bitrates.

The device is equipped with one standard (Type A) USB 2.0 port. It can be used to connect a keyboard, mouse, drives and other standard devices. Unfortunately, there was no room for at least one more port on the case. So, in fact, the most convenient option would be to use a computer with input devices connected via Bluetooth, or work with a USB hub in the monitor.

The built-in SSD in this model appears in the device manager as Samsung MBG4GC. It has an eMMC interface and a capacity of 32 GB. The disk has a 6.35 GB operating system recovery partition, so that leaves about 22.55 GB for the user, and 19.8 GB free out of the box. After installing the latest updates at the time of testing, the amount of free space is reduced to 16.9 GB. Note that the computer has a microSDXC port, so you can relatively easily expand the amount of space for storing user data.

The only standard option for connecting to the network is the built-in Wi-Fi controller based on the Realtek RTL8723BS chip, connected via SDIO, since no other methods are provided in this platform. This chip was introduced last year and provides an 802.11b/g/n wireless adapter with support for the 2.4 GHz band and a maximum connection speed of 150 Mbps, as well as Bluetooth 4.0. There is no mention of BLE support in the device specifications.

The product also includes an implementation of wireless display connection, which is natively supported by Windows. When working with the Netgear PCTV3000 adapter, the resolution of the additional monitor was 1366x768, and video and audio could be output to it.

The Micro-USB port is used to power the computer. The stated requirements for the power supply are 5 V 2 A. We will try to evaluate the actual consumption in the testing section.

It is quite expected that there are no options for changing the configuration in such a compact case. The only thing left for the user is to install a memory card to increase disk space.

The modification in question comes with a 32-bit version of the Microsoft Windows operating system with Bing. There is no additional software installed on the computer, except for the bundled antivirus subscription, but you will need to download it yourself.

When you turn on the device for the first time, the user will be asked to specify several parameters for the operating system, including the ability to select the interface language (Russian is present in the list). Further operation of the product is no different from traditional personal computers.

Testing

Since we have already encountered such a platform in both tablets and microcomputers, the approximate level of its performance is known. The product is suitable for mass tasks that do not require computing speed - browsing Internet sites (with a reasonable number of tabs in the browser), working with email, editing simple office documents, consuming multimedia content (photos, music, videos), communicating via the network, casual games and so on.

The main comments in this case relate to the small amount of RAM and low network access performance. The first problem can be dealt with by launching only the applications that are needed at the moment, and the second can be solved by using external network adapters with a USB interface.

As we wrote above, system performance in the case of such solutions depends not so much on the main platform, but on the settings of the processor operating modes, the choice of RAM modules and the characteristics of the system drive. So let's start this section by checking individual components.

The computing cores of a single-chip system operate at a frequency of 500 MHz in idle mode. When a load appears in the form of processor stress tests of the AIDA64 program, they are overclocked to 1583 MHz. The core temperature in this mode is about 60 degrees. Let us remind you that this product has a built-in fan that allows you to keep heating at a reasonable level throughout the entire operating temperature range from 0 to 35 degrees.

If you put a load on all components of the system at once, the temperatures rise to about 70 degrees, but even in this mode throttling does not occur. In terms of clock speeds, the cores switch between 1333 and 1583 MHz states.

You can see the maximum declared frequency of 1833 MHz on a single-threaded load, for example in the LinX test running in one thread.

As we can see, the fan greatly helps to ensure a high level of performance and ensure a comfortable temperature regime. The price of this is a slightly increased, compared to some other similar solutions, the size of the computer case and the noise produced by the fan. Fortunately, if there is no load and no heat, it is completely off. It is not possible to determine the exact parameters of the fan operation algorithm. Monitoring it during stress tests showed that it probably turns on when temperatures reach about 60 degrees and turns off when they drop to 50 degrees. In this case, the fan rotation speed is constant and it is impossible to check it programmatically. Such characteristics lead to the fact that during Futuremark tests the fan was running almost constantly.

Comparison with the previous system, which was not equipped with an active cooling system, is clearly in favor of Intel's solution. Most likely, this will provide a higher level of performance in resource-intensive tasks due to the absence of a reduction in the frequencies of the processor cores.

Let's now look at the AIDA64 report on working with RAM. Let us remember that this SoC uses a single-channel memory controller.

The results are almost completely consistent with those previously seen on this platform. A similar comment can be made for synthetic GPGPU tests.

So from the point of view of the processor and RAM operating parameters chosen by the manufacturer, there are no comments.

More important for the user is the speed of the system drive. Using the eMMC interface does not in itself guarantee a certain performance. Much depends on both the controller and the flash memory chips.

In this case, we can say that the choice turned out to be quite successful - streaming read and write speeds exceed 160 and 70 MB/s, respectively. This, of course, is not SATA or PCIe, but for this segment the values are very good.

At the same time, let's look at working with external drives - a SanDisk Ultra memory card and a solid-state drive connected via USB 2.0 (using a hub and additional power).

Considering that in this case we will most likely not be talking about exchanging large amounts of data with a standard drive, but direct work with external drives, the shown maximum speeds of 20-30 MB/s can also be assessed as quite decent.

Today, using computers without network access is almost impossible, so the characteristics and speed of network adapters can play a big role. In this case, the platform limits the manufacturer to the SDIO interface, and the wireless adapter installed in the model under review is not amazing and is similar to those installed in mass-market inexpensive smartphone models - 802.11n in the 2.4 GHz band with one antenna and a maximum connection speed of 150 Mbit/s. In ideal line-of-sight conditions over a distance of several meters, it shows performance of 50 Mbps. However, in reality, given the format of the device and the likely location of its placement, everything could be much worse. When installed behind a monitor and connected to a router that was located about six meters behind one wall, the speed drops to 15 Mbit/s. It’s no longer easy to talk about comfortable work in this case. For example, after turning on the computer for the first time, it decided to download about one gigabyte of updates for the operating system... In addition, such speeds significantly limit multimedia scenarios with network sources or media libraries.

Let's now move on to Futuremark's integrated benchmarks - PCMark 7, PCMark 8 and 3DMark. For comparison, the tables will show the performance of the Foxconn Ultra Nano PC on a similar platform, which we tested a couple of months ago. Let us recall that synthetics showed similarity between the participants in computing tests, differences in drive speeds, and significant differences in processor performance under high load. All tests were carried out with a connected monitor resolution of 1920×1080 pixels.

PCMark 7 Scenarios	Intel Compute Stick	Foxconn Ultra Nano PC
PCMark score	2395	1993
Lightweight	2339	1934
Productivity	1807	1585
Entertainment	1579	1189
Creativity	4786	3424
Computation	5822	4570
System Storage	4096	3059

Depending on the scenario, the advantage of the first participant ranges from 14 to 40%. It probably won’t be possible to explain this only with a faster drive. Most likely, the operation of the system's central processor also plays a role here. This version of the test does not have convenient means of checking its parameters, but PCMark 8 reports are more informative. But let's look at the results first.

PCMark 8 Scenarios	Intel Compute Stick	Foxconn Ultra Nano PC
Home accelerated 3.0	1078	971
Creative accelerated 3.0	956	855
Work accelerated 2.0	1137	1143

In the first two tests, the advantage of the Intel solution is about ten percent, and the third one works equally well on these devices. It was not possible to test the system drive in the Intel Compute Stick due to its small volume.

This version of the test package has the useful ability to view graphs of the temperature (turquoise line) and frequency (purple line) of the processor, which will allow us to compare the two systems in more detail. In this case, the graphs refer to the Creative template run. The time scale is slightly different, but some features can be found.

First of all, it is worth noting that the average temperature line for the Intel system is at 60 degrees, while for the opponent it is at 80 degrees. As for the frequency, the first participant boasts a stable 1583 MHz in the Music To Go and Video Editing Part 2 v2 templates, while the second solution is forced to sometimes reset the frequency to 500 MHz, which clearly affects the result.

Let's now look at the graphics tests of the 3DMark package. Despite the fact that solutions cannot be called gaming, graphics performance today still plays a certain role in other applications.

3DMark Scripts		Intel Compute Stick	Foxconn Ultra Nano PC
Ice Storm	Score	10861	8741
	Graphics score	10490	8737
	Physics score	12401	8756
Ice Storm Extreme	Score	6737	4719
	Graphics score	5975	4223
	Physics score	12173	8020
Cloud gate	Score	1022	1020
	Graphics score	1019	1044
	Physics score	1034	946

In Ice Storm scenarios, the advantage of Intel's solution ranges from 20% to 50%. But Cloud gate differs slightly between products. Let's see here what the situation was with temperatures and frame rates during the Ice Storm test.

As in the previous comparison, let’s first pay attention to the temperature scale, and then to the dynamics of frame rate changes. There is another confirmation of the correctness of the active cooling solution chosen by Intel.

Despite the use of one of the younger modifications of the Bay Trail-T family in the model under review, we can say that it quite successfully copes with the tasks stated for it in terms of performance. Of course, there are certain compromises in terms of multitasking, network speed and storage capacity, but if you understand these limits, the device can be in demand for many categories of users.

As an addition, we present the values of power consumed by the device obtained in several scenarios. The model was connected to a monitor, a Logitech wireless receiver for a keyboard and mouse was installed in the USB port, and a 32 GB memory card was present in the microSD slot. The evaluation was carried out by averaging over five minutes of measurements of the current consumed by the Micro-USB port in several scenarios: inactivity, data exchange over a wireless network, CPU stress test in AIDA64, stress test of all components in AIDA64.

As we can see, the requirements for the power supply indicate 2 A with a large margin (however, we did not take into account the use of external drives). The actual maximum consumption in our configuration is only slightly higher than 5 W. So in most practical use cases, a standard USB output on a TV or other device may be sufficient for a computer.

Conclusion

Before we evaluate the device, let's look at the prices. For the considered modification with Windows, the manufacturer indicates a recommended price of $149, the version with Ubuntu is planned to be sold for $99. Considering that you only need a keyboard and mouse for operation, these numbers look quite attractive. As expected from such a manufacturer as Intel, the computer has a good design and interesting appearance, is well assembled and has sufficient equipment. Separately, it is worth mentioning the effective solution to the issue of overheating, which allows for stable performance. However, we would recommend that potential buyers carefully evaluate their requirements before purchasing this device.

The microcomputer is quite capable of handling the traditional basic set of Internet+Office+Multimedia tasks. This is facilitated by the efficient cores of the main chip, a good graphics unit and a fast system storage. Optimization of the Windows 8.1 operating system also plays a certain role. But it’s probably not worth approaching this solution like a familiar desktop computer, even an entry-level one. Limited RAM can affect multitasking, and the lack of fast external interfaces reduces the comfort of performing some tasks.

We have already mentioned above the scenarios for using Intel Compute Stick proposed by the manufacturer. Testing has shown that they all fit well into the concept and capabilities of the model. We can offer several more - an additional computer for the kitchen, living room or children's room, a mobile solution for those users who often need to work in different places, an emulator of game consoles of previous generations, a microserver, a home automation controller, a solution for transport. True, in almost every case some compromises will have to be made, for example in terms of connecting peripherals, appearance or ease of management, but, in general, we do not see any significant problems in these tasks. It is also worth mentioning the need in some cases to independently resolve issues with additional software, for example, to implement a multifunctional media center.

It would be interesting to look at a similar microcomputer with older versions of the family, which, with a similar thermal package, have a faster RAM controller, support for 4 GB, increased frequencies of processor cores and graphics. True, most likely, this will be a completely different segment in terms of cost, since the chips themselves are more than twice as expensive, and the board for them requires a more complex one. And there it’s already not far from the Intel NUC. In any case, a full-fledged x86 computer with an operating system for $150, and even under the Intel brand - this combination is clearly worth paying attention to.

Video review

In conclusion, we suggest watching our video review of the Intel Compute Stick microcomputer:

There are different microcomputers - really “micro” and slightly larger, not very productive and generally not suitable for anything other than Internet surfing. Today this type includes a whole host of different devices with different capabilities and purposes, but among the apparent diversity it is not easy to find a model that is powerful enough in its class. It is even more difficult to find such a PC in Russia. The models that are on the market today are, for the most part, only suitable for Internet surfing and watching movies with far from the highest resolution. Intel itself decided to rectify the situation by releasing a microcomputer based on a hardware platform of its own design. We are talking about the Intel Bay Trail platform in the Intel Bay Trail-T version, intended primarily for tablet computers, but successfully used in many other devices. The new microcomputer has everything from Intel - both design and hardware. Well, who, if not Intel itself, knows better what form factor and what functionality a device on the Intel hardware platform should have?

⇡ Scope of delivery

The device comes in a compact cardboard box, corporate blue for Intel. Inside, in addition to the microcomputer itself, the following accessories were found:

HDMI cable;
USB ↔ Micro-USB cable;
power adapter with a set of four plugs of different standards;
quick printed user guide;
activation card for an annual subscription to McAfee antivirus.

We will get to know the purpose of the accessories in more detail a little later, but for now let’s look at the technical characteristics of the new product.

⇡ Specifications

Intel Compute Stick
CPU	Intel Atom Z3735F, 4 × 1.33 GHz (1.83 GHz), 2 MB L3
Graphics controller	Intel HD Graphics
RAM	2 GB DDR3L-1333 (667 MHz) (soldered on board)
Storage system	1 × eMMC 5.0 32 GB, Samsung MBG4GC
Flash card connector	microSDXC
	1 × USB 2.0 type A 1 × Micro-USB (power supply only) 1 x HDMI 1.4a
WiFi	802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth	4.0
Sound	Intel High Definition Audio
Nutrition	Power adapter 5 V, 2 W; Via USB
Size, mm	104×38×13
Weight, g	54
operating system	Windows 8.1 with Bing 32-bit
Official manufacturer's warranty, months.	12
*Approximate price, rub.**	10 500

* Average price on Yandex.Market at the time of writing.

The microcomputer is available in two versions - with different OS: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Windows 8.1 with Bing. We got the second option for testing. Interestingly, the manufacturer slightly deprived the version of the Intel Compute Stick microcomputer running Ubuntu, providing it with less RAM and disk subsystem and making it, accordingly, cheaper. As for the second version of this device, which came to our test laboratory, its OS has a 32-bit kernel. But the word Bing in the name means little to the user, except that this not the most popular search engine is built into the Internet Explorer browser. If you want, use it, if you don’t want, use any other.


Processor and Chipset Information

As mentioned above, the Intel Compute Stick microcomputer is based on the Intel Bay Trail-T platform with the quad-core Intel Atom Z3735F, which already belongs to the second generation of processors for this platform, released last spring and developed on the 22-nanometer Silvermont architecture. This processor is one of the most inexpensive in the line, and therefore has a minimum clock frequency, which in nominal operating mode is 1.33 GHz and can be increased to 1.83 GHz in turbo mode. The volume of the second level cache is 2 MB. The processor is a very economical model. The SDP (Scenario Design Power) indicator, that is, the level of average power consumption during everyday use, is only 2.2 W. Obviously, most often an active cooling system is not required for this processor, but in the case of the Intel Compute Stick it is still implemented.

In general, there are many much more interesting models in the Intel Bay Trail-T processor family. It is not clear why the manufacturer chose the Intel Atom Z3735F, which has a number of serious limitations regarding RAM, video output and other interfaces. Most likely, this was done for economic reasons, because a more productive device will cost more, which means the consumer circle will be completely different.


Memory information

One of the most important limitations of the Intel Atom Z3735F processor is that it has a single-channel RAM controller, the maximum volume of which is not four, like other processor modifications, but two gigabytes. This is exactly how much is soldered onto the Intel Compute Stick motherboard. The DDR3L-1333 module is used, that is, the maximum possible frequency for the Intel Atom Z3735F. The microcomputer has a small amount of RAM, but its modification with Ubuntu has an even smaller value - only 1 GB.


Information about the integrated video adapter

The Intel Atom Z3735F processor has integrated Intel HD Graphics with four execution units, running at a base clock speed of 311 MHz and can be overclocked to 646 MHz if necessary. We have already become acquainted with this video adapter more than once, but different processors have different operating frequencies, so we can only talk about the performance and capabilities of Intel HD Graphics after testing. Let us only add that in this case the video adapter operates with a resolution of no higher than 1920 × 1080 pixels, that is, Full HD, while other processors of the Intel Bay Trail-T family can output images with a resolution of 4K.

The disk subsystem of the microcomputer is represented by a Samsung MBG4GC eMMC module with a capacity of 32 GB (29.0 GB available). The disk is represented by one working partition with a capacity of 22.55 GB, on which the operating system is installed. The rest of the volume is allocated for service information and the recovery section. As in the case of RAM, there is a strong desire to increase the capacity of the built-in disk subsystem of the Intel Compute Stick at least twice, but, alas, this is not possible. Well, the modification of the microcomputer with Ubuntu has an eMMC module with a capacity of only 8 GB. In this case, nothing but a video player and a couple more utilities will simply fit on this disk. You will have to use flash cards, because the Intel Compute Stick has a microSDXC reader on board.

To connect external drives and other devices, there is a single USB port on board the microcomputer. The fact that there is only one port is easily explained by the lack of free space on board the new product. In addition, the manufacturer has placed not a smaller, but a full-size version of the Type A USB port. If necessary, you will have to use a USB hub, which, by the way, can be the video panel itself, to which the Compute Stick is connected. But the fact that the USB interface of the Intel Compute Stick has a specification not 3.0, but 2.0, should be considered one of the shortcomings for which the processor used is again to blame. While other models in the Intel Bay Trail-T family have a built-in USB 3.0 controller, the Intel Atom Z3735F processor only works with a 2.0 bus.

The Intel Compute Stick has a standard set of wireless communications. A Realtek RTL8723BS module is installed on board, providing Wi-Fi communications standard 802.11 b/g/n and Bluetooth 4.0. As for the sound, the new product is broadcast via the HDMI interface - there are no separate connectors in the device. Power is supplied via USB, for which there is an additional Micro-USB port on board, which can be connected either to one of the USB ports of the video panel or to the power adapter included in the supply. Bottom view

The body of the new product is made of black plastic and consists of two halves. The lower part and side edges have a rough surface, but the top panel is varnished. Naturally, it instantly attracts fingerprints and dust, and then the first scratches will appear on it. The user can compensate for the extremely impractical solution of the manufacturer only by not removing the protective plastic film from the gloss or by sticking his own.

The main interface of the device - HDMI video output - is located on one of the narrow side edges. Since the microcomputer case is still not exactly “micro,” connecting it to the video panel without the short extension cord included in the package can be quite problematic.

All other Intel Compute Stick interfaces are located on the long side edges. On one side there are USB 2.0 and Micro-USB ports, a power control button, as well as a loop for attaching some kind of lanyard or cable that ensures the safety of the device if the video panel with it is placed in a public place. On the other side of the case there is only a microSDXC memory card reader. As for the top lacquered panel, it houses a blue LED power indicator and two large ventilation windows, behind one of which a miniature fan is visible. Small ventilation holes are also located on the side edges.

Today, almost any TV, additional monitor, or even a projector equipped with an HDMI port can turn into a personal computer equipped with Windows 10. And it only takes a few seconds. The secret to this magical transformation is a new generation of micro-desktops, like Intel's Compute Stick, which costs about 13,500 rubles ($159). They are only slightly larger than a USB dongle and plug into the backup HDMI port.

Such microcomputers allow us to take a fresh look at the concept of a pocket PC. Starting with the original Computer Stick, which made a splash at CES 2015 and was redesigned in 2016, you can finally have a full-fledged pocketknife-sized Windows desktop that you can carry in your pocket. The latest version of the Computer Stick currently costs 13,500 rubles ($159) at retail, although this price may drop further.

All this is part of the growing trend towards miniaturization of such devices. Set-top boxes like Roku or Amazon Fire TV are the size of a small book. Similar solutions are available for desktop computers. If, of course, you are willing to put up with some inconveniences.

Computer Stick, like its analogues, are by no means hi-end devices. In fact, they are somewhere on the level of inexpensive laptops costing up to $200. They carry a low-power Intel Atom processor, 2GB of RAM and 32GB of flash storage (most of which is occupied by the operating system).

However, those who need to quickly turn a TV or monitor into a computer rarely need anything more than simple web surfing, watching streaming video or working with other online services, for which such functionality is more than enough.

This year the Computer Stick has become longer, but has an additional USB port.

Computer Stick 2016. What's changed?

The 2016 model has evolved in a positive direction. Externally, it is the same small block with a matte surface and rounded corners. It is a little longer than its predecessor, but this is forgivable, because it now has two USB ports (one USB 3.0 and the other USB 2.0) versus one on its predecessor. The WiFi antenna now supports the 802.11ac standard (although WiFi problems were noted with its predecessor), and the Intel Atom processor has been updated to the latest version called Cherry Trail. Although even with the old processor, last year's model played HD video very well. This is despite the fact that Atom processors, regardless of generation, are by no means intended for everyday work computers.

Specifications

Estimated price - 13,500 rubles ($159);
Processor - Intel Atom x5-Z8300, 1.44 GHz;
RAM - 2048MB DDR3 SDRAM 1600MHz;
Video adapter - 128MB (dedicated) intel HD Graphics;
Permanent memory - 32GB SSD;
Operating system - Windows 10 Home (32-bit).

Design and functionality

The Compute Stick's design, regardless of generation, is sleek and minimalistic. At least that's what it seems at first glance. And of course, installing and running it is a little more complicated than just “insert into the HDMI port.”

First, you need nutrition. So don't forget about the Micro-USB cable and power supply. This time the cable is longer, a little less than a meter, but it is still an extra wire. Perhaps in the future, in some new version of HDMI, it will be possible to supply power directly through the video port, but this is still a long way off. Also, in case the dimensions do not allow you to insert the unit directly into the HDMI port of the TV, an additional HDMI cable is provided.

Next in line is a keyboard and/or mouse. There are several options here. You can connect wired versions (fortunately there are now two USB ports). Or you can use wireless options by connecting them via a USB radio or Bluetooth. The last option is the most preferable because there is no need to occupy USB ports with cables or radio modules. Especially considering that there are already enough cables.

Intel also offers an app called Intel Remote Keyboard, available for iOS and Android, that will allow you to connect an on-screen keyboard and touchpad from your smartphone or tablet. This is quite useful if you only need basic access to the system or plan to use the mouse for navigation and your smartphone's on-screen keyboard for entering passwords or URLs.

Ports and connectors

Video - HDMI;
Audio - no;
Data - 1xUSB 3.0, 1xUSB 2.0, micro-SD card reader up to 128GB;
Network - WiFi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0;
There is no optical drive.

Performance

Last year's first generation Compute Stick had good performance. The power was quite enough for Web surfing and a media player. But she was also prone to sudden slowdowns. The new processor installed on the 2016 version (or, if you look at the names, Cherry Trail vs Bay Trail) shows similar or even more modest results in our benchmark tests, but you most likely won’t even feel the difference. They both compete well with fellow micro PC Kangaroo Mobile Desktop Computer and Lenovo's inexpensive 100S laptop. Determining a clear leader is quite difficult.

Well, as a dessert, don’t forget about Windows 10. Let us remember that last year’s version only had Windows 8. At the same time, Windows 10 is better optimized for weak machines, which somewhat smoothes out the inconvenience of use.

According to the test results, the new model turned out to be a little faster than its predecessor (probably thanks to Windows 10 and the Edge browser), but running several tasks simultaneously still causes lags. However, the mini-PC copes well with basic tasks, such as launching Netflix or YouTube.

The Computer Stick 2016 also handles light games well, but the small amount of memory left after the operating system starts up leaves a limited selection of legacy games like Torchlight or Amnesia: The Dark Descent that will run on almost any platform. If you want something more, then think about the slot for micro-SD cards, which support cards up to 128GB.

Conclusion

Micro PC prices have dropped dramatically, approaching the $100 mark, so $159 for an Intel Computer Stick is expensive. This is despite the (relatively) good performance of the new configuration, as well as two USB ports, which can be very useful.

In principle, the same Asus Chromebit can boast better characteristics, even for a lower price. But it has ChromeOS, which means no new apps. If you're looking for a more powerful Windows-based micro PC, though, check out Intel's latest Core M, coming out this year. But keep in mind that it will be twice as expensive.

As a device for watching videos or surfing the web for everyday use or travel, secure transportation of business data or applications, or just trying to breathe new life into an old TV or monitor, the Compute Stick is pretty out of the price range. But if Intel can bring the price down to $99, then I will say that this will be a “must have” product for anyone interested in such functionality.

Pros: The second generation of the Intel Compute Stick has received several improvements and is great for everyday web surfing and HD video playback.

Cons: There is very little memory, so installing applications or downloading videos is problematic. Despite the modern design, additional adapters and a tangle of cables greatly spoil the impression.

Result: Intel has fixed last year's handheld blunders, but be prepared for weak specs. However, for email, social networks or video, the resources provided are quite enough.

The target audience that may find the Compute Stick useful for household use is quite clearly defined. Firstly, these are people who need a full-fledged personal computer always and everywhere. For example, for constant presentations using x86-compatible software. Put the device in your pocket and you're done. Secondly, these are users who use the computer exclusively for Internet surfing and simple office applications. Thirdly, the Compute Stick may be of interest to those who want to turn it into a media player and connect it directly to the TV, thereby getting a 2-in-1 device. The mini-computer reviewed today copes with all these tasks.

In my opinion, it makes no sense to make serious claims about the Compute Stick's performance. In a tiny form factor with an area of 30x90 mm they fit something that can work stably with a minimum of energy consumption and very low heat generation. It turned out well. The stated 32 GB of memory may not be enough for some, but in this case there is always the opportunity to increase disk space by purchasing an SD card. But we have the right to demand quieter (ideally silent) operation from the Compute Stick.

Perhaps the only thing seriously disappointing about the device is its price. Not everyone will be able/willing to pay more than ten thousand rubles for a mini-computer. That's why Compute Stick is a thing in itself. That is, a device intended for a narrow circle of people. However, it clearly demonstrates the level to which high technology has grown. To the point where computers that fit comfortably in your pocket are becoming commonplace.